Paper detail

Conditioning on the pre-test versus gain score modeling: revisiting the controversy in a multilevel setting

We consider estimating the effect of a treatment on the progress of subjects tested both before and after treatment assignment. A vast literature compares the competing approaches of modeling the post-test score conditionally on the pre-test score versus modeling the difference, namely the gain score. Our contribution resides in analyzing the merits and drawbacks of the two approaches in a multilevel setting. This is relevant in many fields, for example education with students nested into schools. The multilevel structure raises peculiar issues related to the contextual effects and the distinction between individual-level and cluster-level treatment. We derive approximate analytical results and compare the two approaches by a simulation study. For an individual-level treatment our findings are in line with the literature, whereas for a cluster-level treatment we point out the key role of the cluster mean of the pre-test score, which favors the conditioning approach in settings with large clusters.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.