Paper detail

Concerning the $L^4$ norms of typical eigenfunctions on compact surfaces

Let $(M,g)$ be a two-dimensional compact boundaryless Riemannian manifold with Laplacian, $Δ_g$. If $e_λ$ are the associated eigenfunctions of $\sqrt{-Δ_g}$ so that $-Δ_g e_λ= λ^2 e_λ$, then it has been known for some time \cite{soggeest} that $\|e_λ\|_{L^4(M)}\lesssim λ^{1/8}$, assuming that $e_λ$ is normalized to have $L^2$-norm one. This result is sharp in the sense that it cannot be improved on the standard sphere because of highest weight spherical harmonics of degree $k$. On the other hand, we shall show that the average $L^4$ norm of the standard basis for the space ${\mathcal H}_k$ of spherical harmonics of degree $k$ on $S^2$ merely grows like $(\log k)^{1/4}$. We also sketch a proof that the average of $\sum_{j = 1}^{2k + 1} \|e_λ\|_{L^4}^4$ for a random orthonormal basis of ${\mathcal H}_k$ is O(1). We are not able to determine the maximum of this quantity over all orthonormal bases of ${\mathcal H}_k$ or for orthonormal bases of eigenfunctions on other Riemannian manifolds. However, under the assumption that the periodic geodesics in $(M,g)$ are of measure zero, we are able to show that for {\it any} orthonormal basis of eigenfunctions we have that $\|e_{λ_{j_k}}\|_{L^4(M)}=o(λ_{j_k}^{1/8})$ for a density one subsequence of eigenvalues $λ_{j_k}$. This assumption is generic and it is the one in the Duistermaat-Gullemin theorem \cite{dg} which gave related improvements for the error term in the sharp Weyl theorem. The proof of our result uses a recent estimate of the first author \cite{Sokakeya} that gives a necessary and sufficient condition that $\|e_λ\|_{L^4(M)}=o(λ^{1/8})$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.