Paper detail

Computational materials design of attractive Fermion system with large negative effective $U$ in the hole-doped Delafossite of CuAlO$_2$, AgAlO$_2$ and AuAlO$_2$

In order to realize super-high-critical temperature $(T_c)$ superconductors ($T_c$>1,000 K) based on general design rules for negative effective $U$ $(U_{eff})$ systems by controlling purely-electronic and attractive Fermion mechanisms, we perform computational materials design for the negative $U_{eff}$ system in hole-doped two-dimensional (2D) Delafossite CuAlO$_2$, AgAlO$_2$ and AuAlO$_2$ from ${\it ab\ initio}$ calculations. It is found that the large negative $U_{eff}$ in the hole-doped attractive Fermion systems for CuAlO$_2$ ($U_{eff}$ = -4.53 eV), AgAlO$_2$ ($U_{eff}$ = -4.88 eV), AuAlO$_2$ ($U_{eff}$ = -4.14 eV). These values are 10 times larger than that in hole-doped three-dimensional (3D) CuFeS$_2$ ($U_{eff}$ = -0.44 eV). For future calculations of the $T_c$ and phase diagram by quantum Monte Carlo simulations, we propose the negative $U_{eff}$ Hubbard model with the anti-bonding single $π$-band model for CuAlO$_2$, AgAlO$_2$ and AuAlO$_2$ by using the parameters obtained from ${\it ab\ initio}$ electronic structure calculations. The behavior of $T_c$ in the 2D Delafossite of CuAlO$_2$, AgAlO$_2$ and AuAlO$_2$ and 3D Chalcopyrite of CuFeS$_2$ shows the interesting chemical trend, ${\it i.e.,}$ $T_c$ increases exponentially in the weak coupling regime $|U_{eff}| < W$ ($\sim$ 2 eV) (where $W$ is the band width of Hubbard model) for the hole-doped CuFeS$_2$, and then $T_c$ goes through a maximum when $|U_{eff}| \sim W$ (2.8 eV, 3.5 eV) for the hole-doped AgAlO$_2$ and AuAlO$_2$, and finally $T_c$ decreases with increasing $|U_{eff}|$ in the strong coupling regime, where $|U_{eff}| > W$ (1.7 eV), for the hole-doped CuAlO$_2$. In this strong coupling regime, one can expect that $T_c$ = 1,000 $\sim$ 2,000 K by assuming the relation of the very strong coupling as $2Δ/ k_{\rm B}T_c$ = 50 $\sim$100 and the superconducting gap $Δ\sim |U_{eff}|$ = 4.53 eV $\sim$ 50,000 K.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.