Paper detail

Compressive Deconvolution in Random Mask Imaging

We investigate the problem of reconstructing signals from a subsampled convolution of their modulated versions and a known filter. The problem is studied as applies to specific imaging systems relying on spatial phase modulation by randomly coded "masks." The diversity induced by the random masks is deemed to improve the conditioning of the deconvolution problem while maintaining sampling efficiency. We analyze a linear model of the system, where the joint effect of the spatial modulation, blurring, and spatial subsampling is represented by a measurement matrix. We provide a bound on the conditioning of this measurement matrix in terms of the number of masks, the dimension of the image, and certain characteristics of the blurring kernel and subsampling operator. The derived bound shows that stable deconvolution is possible with high probability even if the total number of (scalar) measurements is within a logarithmic factor of the image size. Furthermore, beyond a critical number of masks determined by the extent of blurring and subsampling, every additional mask improves the conditioning of the measurement matrix. We also consider a more interesting scenario where the target image is sparse. We show that under mild conditions on the blurring kernel, with high probability the measurement matrix is a restricted isometry when the number of masks is within a logarithmic factor of the sparsity of the image. Therefore, the image can be reconstructed using many sparse recovery algorithms such as the basis pursuit. The bound on the required number of masks is linear in sparsity of the image but it is logarithmic in its dimension. The bound provides a quantitative view of the effect of the blurring and subsampling on the required number of masks, which is critical for designing efficient imaging systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors7 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.