Paper detail

Completing and studentising Spearman's correlation in the presence of ties

Non-parametric correlation coefficients have been widely used for analysing arbitrary random variables upon common populations, when requiring an explicit error distribution to be known is an unacceptable assumption. We examine an \(\ell_{2}\) representation of a correlation coefficient (Emond and Mason, 2002) from the perspective of a statistical estimator upon random variables, and verify a number of interesting and highly desirable mathematical properties, mathematically similar to the Whitney embedding of a Hilbert space into the \(\ell_{2}\)-norm space. In particular, we show here that, in comparison to the traditional Spearman (1904) \(ρ\), the proposed Kemeny \(ρ_κ\) correlation coefficient satisfies Gauss-Markov conditions in the presence or absence of ties, thereby allowing both discrete and continuous marginal random variables. We also prove under standard regularity conditions a number of desirable scenarios, including the construction of a null hypothesis distribution which is Student-t distributed, parallel to standard practice with Pearson's r, but without requiring either continuous random variables nor particular Gaussian errors. Simulations in particular focus upon highly kurtotic data, with highly nominal empirical coverage consistent with theoretical expectation.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.