Paper detail

Comparison of the luminous efficiency of Ga- and N-polar In$_{x}$Ga$_{1-x}$N/In$_{y}$Ga$_{1-y}$N quantum wells grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy

We investigate the luminescence of Ga- and N-polar In$_{x}$Ga$_{1-x}$N/In$_{y}$Ga$_{1-y}$N quantum wells (QWs) grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy on freestanding GaN as well as 6H-SiC substrates. In striking contrast to their Ga-polar counterparts, the N-polar QWs prepared on freestanding GaN do not exhibit any detectable photoluminescence. Theoretical simulations of the band profiles combined with resonant excitation of the QWs allow us to rule out carrier escape and subsequent surface recombination as the reason for the absence of luminescence. To explore the hypothesis of a high concentration of nonradiative defects at the interfaces between wells and barriers, we analyze Ga- and N-polar QWs prepared on 6H-SiC as a function of the well width. Intense luminescence is observed for both Ga- and N polar samples. As expected, the luminescence of the Ga-polar QWs quenches and red-shifts with increasing well width due to the quantum confined Stark effect. In contrast, both the intensity and the energy of the luminescence from the N-polar samples are essentially independent of well width. Transmission electron microscopy reveals that the N-polar QWs exhibit abrupt interfaces and homogeneous composition, excluding emission from In-rich clusters as the reason for this anomalous behavior. The microscopic origin of the luminescence in the N-polar QWs is elucidated using spatially resolved cathodoluminescence spectroscopy. Regardless of well width, the luminescence is found to not originate from the N-polar QWs, but from the semipolar facets of v-pit defects. These results cast serious doubts on the potential of N-polar QWs grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy for the development of long-wavelength light emitting diodes. What remains to be seen is whether unconventional growth conditions may enable a significant reduction in the concentration of nonradiative defects.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.