Paper detail

Comparison of ITS-90 realizations from 13 K to 273 K between LNE-CNAM and INRIM

Since Key Comparison CCT-K2, only few comparisons on realizations of cryogenic fixed points have been carried out, be they bilateral (three, of which one still pending) or multilateral (two trilateral). Since a forthcoming general follow-up is unlikely, any bilateral comparison, not only key comparisons, is most welcome to provide evidence of the continuing thermometric capabilities of the laboratories involved in the realization of the ITS-90. Not too long after the creation in 2018 of the Joint Research Laboratory for Fluid Metrology Evangelista Torricelli between LNE-CNAM and INRIM, the two laboratories agreed to perform a bilateral comparison at all the cryogenic fixed points of the scale between 13 K and 273 K, including the two hydrogen vapour-pressure temperatures required for the full platinum resistance thermometer range 3.3.1 of the ITS-90. The results are reported here and show a substantial agreement, within the combined uncertainties.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.