Paper detail

Comparison of Graphene Formation on C-face and Si-face SiC {0001} Surfaces

The morphology of graphene formed on the (000-1) surface (the C-face) and the (0001) surface (the Si-face) of SiC, by annealing in ultra-high vacuum or in an argon environment, is studied by atomic force microscopy and low-energy electron microscopy. The graphene forms due to preferential sublimation of Si from the surface. In vacuum, this sublimation occurs much more rapidly for the C-face than the Si-face, so that 150 C lower annealing temperatures are required for the C-face to obtain films of comparable thickness. The evolution of the morphology as a function of graphene thickness is examined, revealing significant differences between the C-face and the Si-face. For annealing near 1320 C, graphene films of about 2 monolayers (ML) thickness are formed on the Si-face, but 16 ML is found for the C-face. In both cases, step bunches are formed on the surface. For the Si-face, layer-by-layer growth of the graphene is observed in areas between the step bunches. At 1170 C, for the C-face, a more 3-dimensional type of growth is found. The average thickness is then about 4 ML, but with a wide variation in local thickness (2 - 7 ML) over the surface. The spatial arrangement of constant-thickness domains are found to be correlated with step bunches on the surface, which form in a more restricted manner than at 1320 C. It is argued that these domains are somewhat disconnected, so that no strong driving force for planarization of the film exists. In a 1-atm argon environment, permitting higher growth temperatures, the graphene morphology for the Si-face is found to become more layer-by-layer-like even for graphene thickness as low as 1 ML. However, for the C-face the morphology becomes much worse, with the surface displaying markedly inhomogeneous nucleation of the graphene. It is demonstrated that these surfaces are unintentionally oxidized, which accounts for the inhomogeneous growth.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.