Paper detail

Comparing a Large Number of Multivariate Distributions

In this paper, we propose a test for the equality of multiple distributions based on kernel mean embeddings. Our framework provides a flexible way to handle multivariate or even high-dimensional data by virtue of kernel methods and allows the number of distributions to increase with the sample size. This is in contrast to previous studies that have been mostly restricted to classical low-dimensional settings with a fixed number of distributions. By building on Cramer-type moderate deviation for degenerate two-sample V-statistics, we derive the limiting null distribution of the test statistic and show that it converges to a Gumbel distribution. The limiting distribution, however, depends on an infinite number of nuisance parameters, which makes it infeasible for use in practice. To address this issue, the proposed test is implemented via the permutation procedure and is shown to be minimax rate optimal against sparse alternatives. During our analysis, an exponential concentration inequality for the permuted test statistic is developed which may be of independent interest.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.