Paper detail

Comparative study of hydrogen embrittlement resistance between additively and conventionally manufactured austenitic stainless steels

Hydrogen embrittlement in 304L (18wt.% Cr, 8-10wt.% Ni) austenitic stainless steel (ASS) fabricated by laser powder-bed-fusion (LPBF) was investigated by tensile testing after electrochemical hydrogen pre-charging and compared to conventionally available 304L ASSs with two different processing histories, (i) casting plus annealing (CA) and (ii) CA plus thermomechanical treatment (TMT). It was revealed that hydrogen-charging led to a significant reduction in ductility for the CA sample, but only a small effect of hydrogen was observed for the LPBF and CA-TMT samples. Hydrogen-assisted cracking behavior was found to be strongly linked to strain-induced martensitic transformation. In addition, the amount of alpha' martensite was much higher in the CA sample than in other samples, suggesting that severe hydrogen embrittlement can be correlated with the low mechanical stability of austenite. Detailed microstructural characterization showed that low austenite stability of the CA sample was mainly attributed to the retained content of delta ferrite and the chemical inhomogeneity inside the gamma matrix (gamma close to delta has ~2 wt.% higher Cr but ~2 wt.% lower Ni), but TMT enhanced the chemical homogeneity and thus austenite stability. By contrast, the LPBF process led directly, i.e. without any thermomechanical treatment, to a fully austenitic structure with homogeneous elemental distribution in the ASS. These results confirmed that the presence of delta and the chemical inhomogeneity inside gamma matrix, which promoted the deformation-induced martensitic transformation and the associated H enrichment at the gamma-alpha' interface, was the primary reason for the severe H-assisted failure.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.