Paper detail

Communication Lower Bound in Convolution Accelerators

In current convolutional neural network (CNN) accelerators, communication (i.e., memory access) dominates the energy consumption. This work provides comprehensive analysis and methodologies to minimize the communication for CNN accelerators. For the off-chip communication, we derive the theoretical lower bound for any convolutional layer and propose a dataflow to reach the lower bound. This fundamental problem has never been solved by prior studies. The on-chip communication is minimized based on an elaborate workload and storage mapping scheme. We in addition design a communication-optimal CNN accelerator architecture. Evaluations based on the 65nm technology demonstrate that the proposed architecture nearly reaches the theoretical minimum communication in a three-level memory hierarchy and it is computation dominant. The gap between the energy efficiency of our accelerator and the theoretical best value is only 37-87%.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.