Paper detail

Comment on "Thermodynamic Principle for Quantum Metrology"

In Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 200501 (2022) the authors consider the thermodynamic cost of quantum metrology. One of the main results is $\mathcal{S} \geq \log(2) \| h_λ\|^{-2} F_Q [ψ_λ]$, which purports to relate the Shannon entropy $\mathcal{S}$ of an optimal measurement (i.e., in the basis of the symmetric logarithmic derivative) to the quantum Fisher information $F_Q$ of the pure state $|ψ_λ\rangle$. However, we show that in the setting considered by the authors we have $\mathcal{S} = \log(2)$ and $\| h_λ\|^{2} = \max_{ψ_λ} F_Q[ψ_λ]$, so that their inequality reduces to the trivial inequality $\max_{ψ_λ} F_Q[ψ_λ] \geq F_Q[ψ_λ]$, and does not in fact relate the entropy $\mathcal{S}$ to the quantum Fisher information. Moreover, for pure state quantum metrology, there exist optimal measurements (though not in the basis of the symmetric logarithmic derivative) for which $0 \leq \mathcal{S} \leq \log(2)$, leading to violations of the inequality for some states $|ψ_λ\rangle$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.