BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shane Dooley

Shane Dooley contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Parent Hamiltonians for stabilizer quantum many-body scars

Quantum many-body scars (QMBS) have attracted considerable interest due to their role in weak ergodicity breaking in many-body systems. We present a general construction that embeds stabilizer states as QMBS of local Hamiltonians. The method relies on a notion of factorizability of Pauli strings on a lattice, which is used to convert stabilizer elements into local, few-body operators that annihilate the stabilizer state. This enables the systematic construction of parent Hamiltonians with zero-energy stabilizer QMBS typically near the middle of the spectrum. The method reproduces several known results in a unified framework, including recent examples of volume-law entangled QMBS, such as the ``rainbow'' QMBS and the entangled antipodal Bell pair state. We also apply the framework to construct examples of stabilizer QMBS with a more complex entanglement structure, such as the cluster state, the toric code state, and a volume-law entangled state we dub the antipodal toric code (ATC) state. Exact diagonalization confirms our results and reveal the stabilizer states as exact eigenstates of their parent Hamiltonian.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Comment on "Thermodynamic Principle for Quantum Metrology"

In Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 200501 (2022) the authors consider the thermodynamic cost of quantum metrology. One of the main results is $\mathcal{S} \geq \log(2) \| h_λ\|^{-2} F_Q [ψ_λ]$, which purports to relate the Shannon entropy $\mathcal{S}$ of an optimal measurement (i.e., in the basis of the symmetric logarithmic derivative) to the quantum Fisher information $F_Q$ of the pure state $|ψ_λ\rangle$. However, we show that in the setting considered by the authors we have $\mathcal{S} = \log(2)$ and $\| h_λ\|^{2} = \max_{ψ_λ} F_Q[ψ_λ]$, so that their inequality reduces to the trivial inequality $\max_{ψ_λ} F_Q[ψ_λ] \geq F_Q[ψ_λ]$, and does not in fact relate the entropy $\mathcal{S}$ to the quantum Fisher information. Moreover, for pure state quantum metrology, there exist optimal measurements (though not in the basis of the symmetric logarithmic derivative) for which $0 \leq \mathcal{S} \leq \log(2)$, leading to violations of the inequality for some states $|ψ_λ\rangle$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Extreme many-body scarring in a quantum spin chain via weak dynamical constraints

It has recently been established that quantum many-body scarring can prevent the thermalisation of some isolated quantum systems, starting from certain initial states. One of the first models to show this was the so-called PXP Hamiltonian, which was used to theoretically model an experiment on a chain of strongly interacting Rydberg atoms. A defining feature of the PXP Hamiltonian is a set of dynamical constraints that make certain states inaccessible to the dynamics. In this paper we construct a class of spin chain models that are parameterised by a discrete variable $\ell$ that controls the "strength" of a dynamical constraint. We show that by increasing $\ell$ the constraint becomes weaker, in the sense that fewer states are excluded from the dynamics. The PXP Hamiltonian is special case for $\ell = 2$. By weakening the constraint to $\ell \geq 4$, however, we find a more extreme version of quantum scarring than in the PXP Hamiltonian, with the number of scar states growing exponentially in the system size.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Simulating quantum circuits by adiabatic computation: improved spectral gap bounds

Adiabatic quantum computing is a framework for quantum computing that is superficially very different to the standard circuit model. However, it can be shown that the two models are computationally equivalent. The key to the proof is a mapping of a quantum circuit to an an adiabatic evolution, and then showing that the minimum spectral gap of the adiabatic Hamiltonian is at least inverse polynomial in the number of computational steps $L$. In this paper we provide two simplified proofs that the gap is inverse polynomial. Both proofs result in the same lower bound for the minimum gap, which for $L \gg 1$ is $\min_sΔ\gtrsim π^2 / [8(L+1)^2]$, an improvement over previous estimates. Our first method is a direct approach based on an eigenstate ansatz, while the the second uses Weyl's theorem to leverage known exact results into a bound for the gap. Our results suggest that it may be possible to use these methods to find bounds for spectral gaps of Hamiltonians in other scenarios.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access