Paper detail

Cognitive Diagnosis with Explicit Student Vector Estimation and Unsupervised Question Matrix Learning

Cognitive diagnosis is an essential task in many educational applications. Many solutions have been designed in the literature. The deterministic input, noisy "and" gate (DINA) model is a classical cognitive diagnosis model and can provide interpretable cognitive parameters, e.g., student vectors. However, the assumption of the probabilistic part of DINA is too strong, because it assumes that the slip and guess rates of questions are student-independent. Besides, the question matrix (i.e., Q-matrix) recording the skill distribution of the questions in the cognitive diagnosis domain often requires precise labels given by domain experts. Thus, we propose an explicit student vector estimation (ESVE) method to estimate the student vectors of DINA with a local self-consistent test, which does not rely on any assumptions for the probabilistic part of DINA. Then, based on the estimated student vectors, the probabilistic part of DINA can be modified to a student dependent model that the slip and guess rates are related to student vectors. Furthermore, we propose an unsupervised method called heuristic bidirectional calibration algorithm (HBCA) to label the Q-matrix automatically, which connects the question difficulty relation and the answer results for initialization and uses the fault tolerance of ESVE-DINA for calibration. The experimental results on two real-world datasets show that ESVE-DINA outperforms the DINA model on accuracy and that the Q-matrix labeled automatically by HBCA can achieve performance comparable to that obtained with the manually labeled Q-matrix when using the same model structure.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.