Paper detail

Coarse differentiation and quantitative nonembeddability for Carnot groups

We give lower bound estimates for the macroscopic scale of coarse differentiability of Lipschitz maps from a Carnot group with the Carnot-Carathéodory metric $(G,\dcc)$ to a few different classes of metric spaces. Using this result, we derive lower bound estimates for quantitative nonembeddability of Lipschitz embeddings of $G$ into a metric space $(X,d_X)$ if $X$ is either an Alexandrov space with nonpositive or nonnegative curvature, a superreflexive Banach space, or another Carnot group that does not admit a biLipschitz homomorphic embedding of $G$. For the same targets, we can further give lower bound estimates for the biLipschitz distortion of every embedding $f : B(n) \to X$, where B(n) is the ball of radius $n$ of a finitely generated nonabelian torsion-free nilpotent group $G$. We also prove an analogue of Bourgain's discretization theorem for Carnot groups and show that Carnot groups have nontrivial Markov convexity. These give the first examples of metric spaces that have nontrivial Markov convexity but cannot biLipschitzly embed into Banach spaces of nontrivial Markov convexity.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.