Paper detail

Classical-Nova Contribution to the Milky Way's $^{26}$Al Abundance: Exit Channel of the Key $^{25}$Al($p,γ$)$^{26}$Si Resonance

Classical novae are expected to contribute to the 1809-keV Galactic $γ$-ray emission by producing its precursor $^{26}$Al, but the yield depends on the thermonuclear rate of the unmeasured $^{25}$Al($p,γ$)$^{26}$Si reaction. Using the $β$ decay of $^{26}$P to populate the key $J^π=3^+$ resonance in this reaction, we report the first evidence for the observation of its exit channel via a $1741.6 \pm 0.6 (\textrm{stat}) \pm 0.3 (\textrm{syst})$ keV primary $γ$ ray, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. By combining the measured $γ$-ray energy and intensity with other experimental data on $^{26}$Si, we find the center-of-mass energy and strength of the resonance to be $E_r = 414.9 \pm 0.6(\textrm{stat}) \pm 0.3 (\textrm{syst}) \pm 0.6(\textrm{lit.})$ keV and $ωγ= 23 \pm 6 (\textrm{stat})^{+11}_{-10}(\textrm{lit.})$ meV, respectively, where the last uncertainties are from adopted literature data. We use hydrodynamic nova simulations to model $^{26}$Al production showing that these measurements effectively eliminate the dominant experimental nuclear-physics uncertainty and we estimate that novae may contribute up to 30% of the Galactic $^{26}$Al.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access24 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.