Paper detail

Charmless Hadronic Two-body Decays of B_u and B_d Mesons

Two-body charmless nonleptonic decays of B_u and B_d mesons are studied within the framework of generalized factorization in which the effective Wilson coefficients $c^{eff}_i$ are renormalization-scale and -scheme independent while factorization is applied to the tree-level hadronic matrix elements. Contrary to previous studies, our $c_i^{eff}$ do not suffer from gauge and infrared problems. Nonfactorizable effects are parametrized in terms of N_c(LL) and N_c(LR), the effective numbers of colors arising from (V-A)(V-A) and (V-A)(V+A) four-quark operators, respectively. Tree and penguin transitions are classified into six different classes. The data of $B^-\toρ^0π^-$ and $B^-\toϕK^-$ clearly indicate that $N_c(LR)\neq N_c(LL)$: The first measurement of the b -> u mode $B^-\toρ^0π^-$ and the experimental information on the tree-dominated mode $B^-\toωπ^-$ all imply that Nc(LL) is less than 3, whereas the CLEO measurement of $B^-\toϕK^-$ shows Nc(LR)>3. For given input parameters, the prediction of ${\cal B}(B\toη' K)$ is largely improved by setting Nc(LL)~2 and Nc(LR)>Nc(LL); in particular, the charm content of the eta' contributes in the right direction. The decay rate of $B\toϕK^*$ is very sensitive to the form-factor ratio A_2/A_1; the absence of $B\toϕK$ events does not necessarily invalidate the factorization approach. If the branching ratio of $B^-\toωK^-$ is experimentally found to be significantly larger than that of $B^-\toρ^0 K^-$, we argue that inelastic final-state rescattering may account for the disparity between $ωK^-$ and $ρ^0 K^-$.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.