Paper detail

Charge carrier mobility and nonproportionality of LaBr$_3$:Ce scintillators

The nonproportional response and related energy resolution of LaBr$_3$:Ce$^3+$ scintillation crystals doped with different concentrations of cerium were studied between 80K and 450K. For Ce$^3+$ concentration of 5% and 30%, LaBr$_3$ showed best proportionality and energy resolution at 80K. For LaBr$_3$:0.2%Ce$^3+$ the best energy resolution and the lowest degree of nonproportional response were instead observed around room temperature. The experimental results were analyzed in terms of charge carrier mobility and using theory of carrier transport in wide band gap semiconductors. We found that scattering of carriers by both lattice and impurity are the key processes determining the particular temperature dependence of carrier mobility and ultimately the scintillation nonproportionality. The calculated maximum of the LaBr$_3$:0.2%Ce$^3+$ carrier mobility corresponds well with the experimentally observed minima of its degree of nonproportionality, when assuming about 100ppm ionized impurity concentration.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.