Paper detail

Chandra and HST Observations of the Supersoft ULX in NGC 247: Candidate for Standard Disk Emission

We report on multiwavelength observations of the supersoft ultraluminous X-ray source (ULX) in NGC 247 made with the Chandra X-ray Observatory and Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We aligned the X-ray and optical images using three objects present on both and identified a unique, point-like optical counterpart to the ULX. The X-ray to optical spectrum is well fitted with an irradiated disk model if the extinction measured for Cepheids in NGC 247 is used. Assuming only Galactic extinction, then the spectrum can be modeled as a standard thin accretion disk. Either result leads to the conclusion that a disk interpretation of the X-ray spectrum is valid, thus the source may be in the X-ray thermal state and contain an intermediate mass black hole of at least 600 solar masses. In contrast to other supersoft ULXs which are transient and exhibit a luminosity temperature relation inconsistent with a disk interpretation of the X-ray emission, the NGC 247 ULX has a relatively steady flux and all available X-ray data are consistent with emission from a disk in the thermal state.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.