Paper detail

Broad levels in $^{17}$O and their relevance for the astrophysical s-process

Levels in $^{17}$O affect the astrophysical s-process in two opposite ways. The neutron production is enhanced by resonances in the $^{13}$C($α$,$n$)$^{16}$O reaction at excitation energies around 7 MeV in $^{17}$O, and the number of available neutrons is reduced by low-lying resonances in the $^{16}$O($n$,$γ$)$^{17}$O reaction corresponding to levels in $^{17}$O with excitation energies of $4-5$ MeV. The present work uses the $^{19}$F($d$,$α$)$^{17}$O reaction to determine absolute widths of the relevant levels in $^{17}$O. The results improve the uncertainties of the previously adopted values and resolve a discrepancy between recent studies for the $1/2^+$ level close to the threshold of the $^{13}$C($α$,$n$)$^{16}$O reaction. In addition, improved excitation energies and widths are provided for several states in $^{17}$O up to excitation energies close to 8 MeV.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.