Paper detail

Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Robotic Gait Orthosis

Reliance on wheelchairs after spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to many medical co-morbidities. Treatment of these conditions contributes to the majority of SCI health care costs. Restoring able-body-like ambulation after SCI may reduce the incidence of these conditions, and increase independence and quality of life. However, no biomedical solution exists that can reverse this lost neurological function, and hence novel methods are needed. Brain-computer interface (BCI) controlled lower extremity prosthesis may constitute one such novel approach. One subject with able-body and one with paraplegia due to SCI underwent electroencephalogram (EEG) recording while engaged in alternating epochs of idling and walking kinesthetic motor imagery (KMI). These data were analyzed to generate an EEG prediction model for online BCI operation. A commercial robotic gait orthosis (RoGO) system (treadmill suspended), was interfaced with the BCI computer. In an online test, the subjects were tasked to ambulate using the BCI-RoGO system when prompted by computerized cues. The performance of this system was assessed with cross-correlation analysis, and omission and false alarm rates. The offline accuracy of the EEG prediction model averaged 86.3%. The cross-correlation between instructional cues and BCI-RoGO walking epochs averaged 0.812 +/- 0.048 (p-value<10^-4). There were on average 0.8 false alarms per session and no omissions. This is the first time a person with parapegia due to SCI regained basic brain-controlled ambulation, thereby indicating that restoring brain-controlled ambulation is feasible. Future work will test this system in a population of individuals with SCI. If successful, this may justify future development of invasive BCI-controlled lower extremity prostheses. This system may also be applied to incomplete SCI to improve neurological outcomes beyond those of standard physiotherapy.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.