Paper detail

BPMR: Bayesian Probabilistic Multivariate Ranking

Multi-aspect user preferences are attracting wider attention in recommender systems, as they enable more detailed understanding of users' evaluations of items. Previous studies show that incorporating multi-aspect preferences can greatly improve the performance and explainability of recommendation. However, as recommendation is essentially a ranking problem, there is no principled solution for ranking multiple aspects collectively to enhance the recommendation. In this work, we derive a multi-aspect ranking criterion. To maintain the dependency among different aspects, we propose to use a vectorized representation of multi-aspect ratings and develop a probabilistic multivariate tensor factorization framework (PMTF). The framework naturally leads to a probabilistic multi-aspect ranking criterion, which generalizes the single-aspect ranking to a multivariate fashion. Experiment results on a large multi-aspect review rating dataset confirmed the effectiveness of our solution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.