Paper detail

Bounds on the Unitarity Triangle, $\sin 2β$ and $K\toπν\barν$ Decays in Models with Minimal Flavour Violation

We present a general discussion of the unitarity triangle from $ε_K$, $ΔM_{d,s}$ and $K \to πν\overlineν$ in models with minimal flavour violation (MFV), allowing for arbitrary signs of the generalized Inami--Lim functions $F_{tt}$ and $X$ relevant for $(ε_K,ΔM_{d,s})$ and $K \to πν\overlineν$, respectively. In the models in which $F_{tt}$ has a sign opposite to the one in the Standard Model, i.e. $F_{tt}<0$, the data for $(ε_K, ΔM_{d,s})$ imply an absolute lower bound on the $B_d\toψK_{S}$ CP asymmetry $a_{ψK_S}$ of 0.69, which is substantially stronger than 0.42 arising in the case of $F_{tt}>0$. An important finding of this paper is the observation that for given $Br(K^+\toπ^+ν\overlineν)$ and $a_{ψK_S}$ only two values for $Br(K_{L}\toπ^0ν\overlineν)$, corresponding to the two signs of $X$, are possible in the full class of MFV models, independently of any new parameters arising in these models. This provides a powerful test for this class of models. Moreover, we derive absolute lower and upper bounds on $Br(K_{L}\toπ^0ν\overlineν)$ as functions of $Br(K^+\toπ^+ν\overlineν)$. Using the present experimental upper bounds on $Br(K^+\toπ^+ν\overlineν)$ and $|V_{ub}/V_{cb}|$, we obtain the absolute upper bound $Br(K_{L}\toπ^0ν\overlineν)< 7.1 \cdot 10^{-10}$ (90% C.L.).

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.