Paper detail

Block-Term Tensor Decomposition Model Selection and Computation: The Bayesian Way

The so-called block-term decomposition (BTD) tensor model, especially in its rank-$(L_r,L_r,1)$ version, has been recently receiving increasing attention due to its enhanced ability of representing systems and signals that are composed of \emph{blocks} of rank higher than one, a scenario encountered in numerous and diverse applications. Uniqueness conditions and fitting methods have thus been thoroughly studied. Nevertheless, the challenging problem of estimating the BTD model structure, namely the number of block terms, $R$, and their individual ranks, $L_r$, has only recently started to attract significant attention, mainly through regularization-based approaches which entail the need to tune the regularization parameter(s). In this work, we build on ideas of sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) and put forward a fully automated Bayesian approach. Through a suitably crafted multi-level \emph{hierarchical} probabilistic model, which gives rise to heavy-tailed prior distributions for the BTD factors, structured sparsity is \emph{jointly} imposed. Ranks are then estimated from the numbers of blocks ($R$) and columns ($L_r$) of non-negligible energy. Approximate posterior inference is implemented, within the variational inference framework. The resulting iterative algorithm completely avoids hyperparameter tuning, which is a significant defect of regularization-based methods. Alternative probabilistic models are also explored and the connections with their regularization-based counterparts are brought to light with the aid of the associated maximum a-posteriori (MAP) estimators. We report simulation results with both synthetic and real-word data, which demonstrate the merits of the proposed method in terms of both rank estimation and model fitting as compared to state-of-the-art relevant methods.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.