Paper detail

Bloch-Grüneisen temperature and universal scaling of normalized resistivity in doped graphene revisited

In this work, we resolved some controversial issues on the Bloch-Grüneisen (BG) temperature in doped graphene via analytical and numerical calculations based on full inelastic electron-acoustic-phonon (EAP) scattering rate and various approximation schemes. Analytic results for BG temperature obtained by semi-inelastic (SI) approximation (which gives scattering rates in excellent agreement with the full inelastic scattering rates) are compared with those obtained by quasi-elastic (QE) approximation and the commonly adopted value of $Θ^{LA}_{F} = 2\hbar v_{LA} k_F/k_B$. It is found that the commonly adopted BG temperature in graphene ($Θ^{LA}_{F}$) is about 5 times larger than the value obtained by the QE approximation and about 2.5 times larger than that by the SI approximation, when using the crossing-point temperature where low-temperature and high-temperature limits of the resistivity meet. The corrected analytic relation based on SI approximation agrees extremely well with the transition temperatures determined by fitting the the low- and high-$T$ behavior of available experimental data of graphene's resistivity. We also introduce a way to determine the BG temperature including the full inelastic EAP scattering rate and the deviation of electron energy from the chemical potential ($μ$) numerically by finding the maximum of $\partial ρ(μ,T)/\partial T$. Using the analytic expression of $Θ_{BG,1}$ we can prove that the normalized resistivity defined as $R_{1}=ρ(μ,T)/ρ(μ,Θ_{BG,1})$ plotted as a function of $(T/Θ_{BG,1})$ is independent of the carrier density. Applying our results to previous experimental data extracted shows a universal scaling behavior, which is different from previous studies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.