Paper detail

Bifurcation analysis of the Yamada model for a pulsing semiconductor laser with saturable absorber and delayed optical feedback

Semiconductor lasers exhibit a wealth of dynamics, from emission of a constant beam of light, to periodic oscillations and excitability. Self-pulsing regimes, where the laser periodically releases a short pulse of light, are particularly interesting for many applications, from material science to telecommunications. Self-pulsing regimes need to produce pulses very regularly and, as such, they are also known to be particularly sensitive to perturbations, such as noise or light injection. We investigate the effect of delayed optical feedback on the dynamics of a self-pulsing semiconductor laser with saturable absorber (SLSA). More precisely, we consider the Yamada model with delay -- a system of three delay-differential equations (DDEs) for two slow and one fast variable -- which has been shown to reproduce accurately self-pulsing features as observed in SLSA experimentally. This model is also of broader interest because it is quite closely related to mathematical models of other self-pulsing systems, such as excitable spiking neurons. We perform a numerical bifurcation analysis of the Yamada model with delay, where we consider both the feedback delay, the feedback strength and the strength of pumping as bifurcation parameters. We find a rapidly increasing complexity of the system dynamics when the feedback delay is increased from zero. In particular, there are new feedback-induced dynamics: stable quasi-periodic oscillations on tori, as well as a large degree of multistability, with up to five pulse-like stable periodic solutions with different amplitudes and repetition rates. An attractor map in the plane of perturbations on the gain and intensity reveals a Cantor set-like, intermingled structure of the different basins of attraction. This suggests that, in practice, the multistable laser is extremely sensitive to small perturbations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.