Paper detail

Behavior variations and their implications for popularity promotions: From elites to mass in Weibo

The boom in social media with regard to producing and consuming information simultaneously implies the crucial role of online user influence in determining content popularity. In particular, understanding behavior variations between the influential elites and the mass grassroots is an important issue in communication. However, how their behavior varies across user categories and content domains, and how these differences influence content popularity are rarely addressed. From a novel view of seven content-domains, a detailed picture of behavior variations among five user groups, from both views of elites and mass, is drawn in Weibo, one of the most popular Twitter-like services in China. Interestingly, elites post more diverse contents with video links while the mass possess retweeters of higher loyalty. According to these variations, user-oriented actions of enhancing content popularity are discussed and testified. The most surprising finding is that the diversity of contents do not always bring more retweets, and the mass and elites should promote content popularity by increasing their retweeter counts and loyalty, respectively. Our results for the first time demonstrate the possibility of highly individualized strategies of popularity promotions in social media, instead of a universal principle.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.