Paper detail

Bayesian Neural Hawkes Process for Event Uncertainty Prediction

Event data consisting of time of occurrence of the events arises in several real-world applications. Recent works have introduced neural network based point processes for modeling event-times, and were shown to provide state-of-the-art performance in predicting event-times. However, neural point process models lack a good uncertainty quantification capability on predictions. A proper uncertainty quantification over event modeling will help in better decision making for many practical applications. Therefore, we propose a novel point process model, Bayesian Neural Hawkes process (BNHP) which leverages uncertainty modelling capability of Bayesian models and generalization capability of the neural networks to model event occurrence times. We augment the model with spatio-temporal modeling capability where it can consider uncertainty over predicted time and location of the events. Experiments on simulated and real-world datasets show that BNHP significantly improves prediction performance and uncertainty quantification for modelling events.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.