Paper detail

Bayesian inference of antibody evolutionary dynamics using multitype branching processes

When our immune system encounters foreign antigens (i.e., from pathogens), the B cells that produce our antibodies undergo a cyclic process of proliferation, mutation, and selection, improving their ability to bind to the specific antigen. Immunologists have recently developed powerful experimental techniques to investigate this process in mouse models. In one such experiment, mice are engineered with a monoclonal B-cell precursor and immunized with a model antigen. B cells are sampled from sacrificed mice after the immune response has progressed, and the mutated genetic loci encoding antibodies are sequenced. This experiment allows parallel replay of antibody evolution, but produces data at only one time point; we are unable to observe the evolutionary trajectories that lead to optimized antibody affinity in each mouse. To address this, we model antibody evolution as a multitype branching process and integrate over unobserved histories conditioned on phylogenetic signal in sequence data, leveraging parallel experimental replays for parameter inference. We infer the functional relationship between B-cell fitness and antigen binding affinity in a Bayesian framework, equipped with an efficient likelihood calculation algorithm and Markov chain Monte Carlo posterior approximation. In a simulation study, we demonstrate that a sigmoidal relationship between fitness and binding affinity can be recovered from realizations of the branching process. We then perform inference for experimental data from 52 replayed B-cell lineages sampled 15 days after immunization, yielding a total of 3,758 sampled B cells. The recovered sigmoidal curve indicates that the fitness of high-affinity B cells is over six times larger than that of low-affinity B cells, with a sharp transition from low to high fitness values as affinity increases.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.