Paper detail

Basic Theoretical Model and Sampling Criteria for Time-Interleaved Photonic Analog-to-Digital Converters

In this paper, we present a basic model for time-interleaved photonic analog-to-digital converter (TIPADC) and analyze its linear, nonlinear, and noise performance. The basic operation mechanism of TIPADC is illustrated and the linear performance is analyzed in frequency domain. The mathematical expressions and the output of the system are presented in each processing step. We reveal that photonic sampling folds the whole spectrum of input signal in a narrow band, which enables the analog bandwidth of a TIPADC to be much higher than the bandwidth of back-end electronics. The feasible regions of the system is obtained in terms of system frequency response, and a set of sampling criteria determining the basic requirements to the system are summarized for typical applications. The results show that the global minimum feasible bandwidth of back-end electronics is the half of single channel sampling rate when the bandwidth of photonic sampling pulse is comparable to input signal frequency. The amplitude and phase noise of photonic sampling pulse train, the thermal noise and shot noise of photodetection, and the quantization noise and aperture jitter noise of EADCs are investigated. The nonlinearity of TIPADC is also analyzed. The effect of different factors, such as the single channel sampling rate, the average optical power and the bandwidth of back-end electronics, on the effective number of bits of TIPADC is qualitatively and quantitatively discussed. The results explicitly show that TIPADC can perform high fidelity conversion to ultra-high speed analog signal and overcome the major performance limitations existing in traditional ADCs such as aperture jitter and bandwidth. The criteria deduced will be an effective supplement to the generalized sampling theorem in designing TIPADC.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.