Paper detail

$B\to Kπ$ Decays with $1/m_b$ Corrections in $QCD$ Factorization

It is commonly believed that a careful investigation of the subleading terms is crucial for a better understanding of the $QCD$ factorization in charmless B decays. In this work the penguin-dominated $B\to Kπ$ decays are discussed systematically, including the subleading corrections in $1/m_b$ due to soft and hard gluons, besides the annihilation contributions. Soft-gluon effects for all the relevant 4-quark effective operators are calculated within the framework of the light-cone QCD sum rules (LCSR). Our observation is that such soft and hard corrections are less important than the annihilation effects, enhancing only the branching ratios by a few percent; the resultant increase in the branching ratios due to the overall ${\cal O}(1/m_b)$ effects is between about $(22-27)%$ of the QCD factorization results with the ${\cal O}(α_s)$ corrections, as the weak phase $γ(=\textmd{Im}V_{ub}^*)$ ranges from $40^0$ to $80^0$. Impacts of the involved uncertainties are discussed in some details.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.