Paper detail

Assignments of $Λ_Q$ and $Ξ_Q$ baryons in the heavy quark-light diquark picture

We apply a new mass formula which is derived analytically in the relativistic flux tube model to the mass spectra of $Λ_Q$ and $Ξ_Q$ (\emph{Q} = \emph{c} or \emph{b} quark) baryons. To this end, the heavy quark-light diquark picture is employed. We find that all masses of the available $Λ_Q$ and $Ξ_Q$ states can be understood well. The assignments to these states do not appear to contradict the strong decay properties. $Λ_c(2760)^+$ and $Ξ_c(2980)$ are assigned to the first radial excitations with $J^P = 1/2^+$. $Λ_c(2940)^+$ and $Ξ_c(3123)$ might be the 2\emph{P} states. The $Λ_c(2880)^+$ and $Ξ_c(3080)$ are the good 1\emph{D} candidates with $J^P = 5/2^+$. $Ξ_c(3055)$ is likely to be a 1\emph{D} state with $J^P = 3/2^+$. $Λ_b(5912)^0$ and $Λ_b(5920)^0$ favor the 1\emph{P} assignments with $J^P = 1/2^-$ and $3/2^-$, respectively. We propose a search for the $\tildeΛ_{c2}(5/2^-)$ state which can help to distinguish the diquark and three-body schemes.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.