Paper detail

Assessing electron emission induced by pulsed ion beams: a time-of-flight approach

We present a method to measure the kinetic energy of electrons emitted upon ion impact via their time-of-flight. Pulsed beams of H$^{+}$, D$_2^{+}$, He$^{+}$ and Ne$^{+}$ ions with velocities between 0.4 and 3.5 a.u. are transmitted through thin, self-supporting carbon and gold foils. Transmitted ions and secondary electrons are detected with a position-sensitive detector behind the sample and their respective energies are determined via their flight times. A coincidence criterium can be applied in the acquisition software. Measured electron energies range between 10 and 400 eV. Above ion velocities of 1 a.u. the most probable electron energy scales with ion velocity pointing towards a kinetic emission mechanism. At lower ion velocities, the electron energy stays constant and lies above the maximum energy transfer possible in a classical binary collision between ion and electron. Potential applications and technical challenges of measuring electron energies and yields with a time-of-flight approach are discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.