Paper detail

Are deviations in a gradually varying mean relevant? A testing approach based on sup-norm estimators

Classical change point analysis aims at (1) detecting abrupt changes in the mean of a possibly non-stationary time series and at (2) identifying regions where the mean exhibits a piecewise constant behavior. In many applications however, it is more reasonable to assume that the mean changes gradually in a smooth way. Those gradual changes may either be non-relevant (i.e., small), or relevant for a specific problem at hand, and the present paper presents statistical methodology to detect the latter. More precisely, we consider the common nonparametric regression model $X_{i} = μ(i/n) + \varepsilon_{i}$ with possibly non-stationary errors and propose a test for the null hypothesis that the maximum absolute deviation of the regression function $μ$ from a functional $g (μ)$ (such as the value $μ(0)$ or the integral $\int_{0}^{1} μ(t) dt$) is smaller than a given threshold on a given interval $[x_{0},x_{1}] \subseteq [0,1]$. A test for this type of hypotheses is developed using an appropriate estimator, say $\hat d_{\infty, n}$, for the maximum deviation $ d_{\infty}= \sup_{t \in [x_{0},x_{1}]} |μ(t) - g( μ) |$. We derive the limiting distribution of an appropriately standardized version of $\hat d_{\infty,n}$, where the standardization depends on the Lebesgue measure of the set of extremal points of the function $μ(\cdot)-g(μ)$. A refined procedure based on an estimate of this set is developed and its consistency is proved. The results are illustrated by means of a simulation study and a data example.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.