Paper detail

Approximate matrix completion based on cavity method

In order to solve large matrix completion problems with practical computational cost, an approximate approach based on matrix factorization has been widely used. Alternating least squares (ALS) and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) are two major algorithms to this end. In this study, we propose a new algorithm, namely cavity-based matrix factorization (CBMF) and approximate cavity-based matrix factorization (ACBMF), which are developed based on the cavity method from statistical mechanics. ALS yields solutions with less iterations when compared to those of SGD. This is because its update rules are described in a closed form although it entails higher computational cost. CBMF can also write its update rules in a closed form, and its computational cost is lower than that of ALS. ACBMF is proposed to compensate a disadvantage of CBMF in terms of relatively high memory cost. We experimentally illustrate that the proposed methods outperform the two existing algorithms in terms of convergence speed per iteration, and it can work under the condition where observed entries are relatively fewer. Additionally, in contrast to SGD, (A)CBMF does not require scheduling of the learning rate.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.