Paper detail

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) coupled with Bayesian model averaging method for estimating mean and standard deviation

Background: We proposed approximate Bayesian computation with single distribution selection (ABC-SD) for estimating mean and standard deviation from other reported summary statistics. The ABC-SD generates pseudo data from a single parametric distribution thought to be the true distribution of underlying study data. This single distribution is either an educated guess, or it is selected via model selection using posterior probability criterion for testing two or more candidate distributions. Further analysis indicated that when model selection is used, posterior model probabilities are sensitive to the prior distribution(s) for parameter(s) and dependable on the type of reported summary statistics. Method: We propose ABC with Bayesian model averaging (ABC-BMA) methodology to estimate mean and standard deviation based on various sets of other summary statistics reported in published studies. We conduct a Monte Carlo simulation study to compare the new proposed ABC-BMA method with our previous ABC-SD method. Results: In the estimation of standard deviation, ABC-BMA has smaller average relative errors (AREs) than that of ABC-SD for normal, lognormal, beta, and exponential distributions. For Weibull distribution, ARE of ABC-BMA is larger than that of ABC-SD but <0.05 in small sample sizes and moves toward zero as sample size increases. When underlying distribution is highly skewed and available summary statistics are only quartiles and sample size, ABC-BMA is recommended but it should be used with caution. Comparison of mean estimation between ABC-BMA and ABC-SD shows similar patterns of results as for standard deviation estimation. Conclusion: ABC-BMA is easy to implement and it performs even better than our previous ABC-SD method for estimation of mean and standard deviation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.