Abstract

One of the most striking but mysterious properties of the sinh-Gordon model (ShG) is the b→1/bb \rightarrow 1/b self-duality of its SS-matrix, of which there is no trace in its Lagrangian formulation. Here bb is the coupling appearing in the model's eponymous hyperbolic cosine present in its Lagrangian, cosh⁡(bϕ)\cosh(bϕ). In this paper we develop truncated spectrum methods (TSMs) for studying the sinh-Gordon model at a finite volume as we vary the coupling constant. We obtain the expected results for b≪1b \ll 1 and intermediate values of bb, but as the self-dual point b=1b=1 is approached, the basic application of the TSM to the ShG breaks down. We find that the TSM gives results with a strong cutoff EcE_c dependence, which disappears according only to a very slow power law in EcE_c. Standard renormalization group strategies -- whether they be numerical or analytic -- also fail to improve upon matters here. We thus explore three strategies to address the basic limitations of the TSM in the vicinity of b=1b=1. In the first, we focus on the small-volume spectrum. We attempt to understand how much of the physics of the ShG is encoded in the zero mode part of its Hamiltonian, in essence how `quantum mechanical' vs `quantum field theoretic' the problem is. In the second, we identify the divergencies present in perturbation theory and perform their resummation using a supra-Borel approximate. In the third approach, we use the exact form factors of the model to treat the ShG at one value of bb as a perturbation of a ShG at a different coupling. In the light of this work, we argue that the strong coupling phase b>1b > 1 of the Lagrangian formulation of model may be different from what is naïvely inferred from its SS-matrix. In particular, we present an argument that the theory is massless for b>1b>1.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.