Paper detail

Analysis on the evolution process of BFW-like model with explosive percolation of multiple giant components

Recently, the modified BFW model on random graph [Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 115701 (2011)], which shows a strongly discontinuous percolation transition with multiple giant components, has attracted much attention from physicists, statisticians and materials scientists. In this paper, by establishing the theoretical expression of evolution equations on the modified BFW model, the steady-state and evolution process are analyzed and a close correspondence is built between the values of parameter αand the number of giant components in steady-states, which fits very well with the numerical simulations. In fact, with the value of αdecreasing to 0.25, the error between theoretical and numerical results is smaller than 4% and trends to 0 rapidly. Furthermore, the sizes of giant components for different evolution strategies can also be obtained by solving some constraints derived from the evolution equations. The analysis of the steady-state and evolution process is of great help to explain why the percolation of modified BFW model is explosive and how explosive it is.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.