Paper detail

Analysis of the data on spin density matrix elements for $γp \to K^{*+}Λ$

In our previous work [Phys. Rev. C {\bf 96}, 035206 (2017)], the high-precision differential cross-section data for $γp \to K^{*+}Λ$ reported by the CLAS Collaboration has been analyzed within an effective Lagrangian approach. It was found that apart from the $t$-channel $K$, $K^*$, and $κ$ exchanges, the $u$-channel $Λ$, $Σ$, and $Σ^*$ exchanges, the $s$-channel $N$ exchange, and the interaction current, one needs to introduce at least two nucleon resonances in the $s$ channel in constructing the reaction amplitudes to describe the cross-section data. One of the needed resonances is $N(2060)5/2^-$, and the other one could be one of the $N(2000)5/2^+$, $N(2040)3/2^+$, $N(2100)1/2^+$, $N(2120)3/2^-$, and $N(2190)7/2^-$ resonances. In this paper, we further include in our analysis the data on spin density matrix elements for $K^*$ meson reported recently by the CLAS Collaboration, with the purpose being to impose further constraints on extracting the resonance contents and to gain a better understanding of the reaction mechanism. It turns out that with the new data on spin density matrix elements taken into account, only the set with the $N(2060)5/2^-$ and $N(2000)5/2^+$ resonances among those five possible solutions extracted from the analysis of the differential cross-section data can satisfactorily describe the data on both the differential cross sections and the spin density matrix elements. Further analysis shows that this reaction is dominated by the $t$-channel $K$ exchange and $s$-channel $N(2060)5/2^-$ and $N(2000)5/2^+$ exchanges.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.