Paper detail

Analysis of the $ \boldsymbol{e^+ e^- \to J/ψD\bar D}$ reaction close to the threshold concerning claims of a $χ_{c0}(2P)$ state

We analyze the $D\bar{D}$ mass distribution from a recent Belle experiment on the $e^+e^- \to J/ψD\bar{D}$ reaction, and show that the mass distribution divided by phase space does not have a clear peak above the $D\bar{D}$ threshold that justifies the experimental claim of a $χ_{c0}(2P)$ state from those data. Then we use a unitary formalism with coupled channels $D^+D^-$, $D^0\bar{D}^0$, $D_s\bar{D}_s$, and $ηη$, with some of the interactions taken from a theoretical model, and use the data to fix other parameters. We then show that, given the poor quality of the data, we can get different fits leading to very different $D\bar{D}$ amplitudes, some of them supporting a $D\bar{D}$ bound state and others not. The main conclusion is that the claim for the $χ_{c0}(2P)$ state, already included in the PDG, is premature, but refined data can provide very valuable information on the $D\bar{D}$ scattering amplitude. As side effects, we warn about the use of a Breit-Wigner amplitude parameterization close to threshold, and show that the $D_s\bar{D}_s$ channel plays an important role in this reaction.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.