Paper detail

Analysis of persistence-based solar irradiance forecasting benchmarks

In this work we analyse a set of benchmark methods for solar irradiance forecasting based on the clear-sky index, namely, persistence, climatology, smart-persistence and convex combination (CC) of persistence and climatology. To assess the boundaries of the benchmarks, we include in the analysis a simple least squares regression technique that uses the last five past samples. For the methods that need data adjustment, we also analyze their variation with different training sets. This work is done for intra-day forecast of global solar horizontal irradiance with 10-minutes and hourly forecast horizons. Our results, obtained in the south-east region of South America known as Pampa Húmeda, confirm the benchmark recommendation, showing that the CC method is exigent for RMSD as it achieves almost the same performance of the more complex linear combination of past measurements. We also observe that the benchmarks have different behavior depending on the metric, as the most exigent benchmark for one metric is not necessarily the most exigent for another.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.