Paper detail

Analysis of centrality in sublinear preferential attachment trees via the CMJ branching process

We investigate centrality and root-inference properties in a class of growing random graphs known as sublinear preferential attachment trees. We show that a continuous time branching processes called the Crump-Mode-Jagers (CMJ) branching process is well-suited to analyze such random trees, and prove that almost surely, a unique terminal tree centroid emerges, having the property that it becomes more central than any other fixed vertex in the limit of the random growth process. Our result generalizes and extends previous work establishing persistent centrality in uniform and linear preferential attachment trees. We also show that centrality may be utilized to generate a finite-sized $1-ε$ confidence set for the root node, for any $ε> 0$ in a certain subclass of sublinear preferential attachment trees.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors7 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.