Paper detail

Analysis of autocorrelation times in Neural Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations

We provide a deepened study of autocorrelations in Neural Markov Chain Monte Carlo (NMCMC) simulations, a version of the traditional Metropolis algorithm which employs neural networks to provide independent proposals. We illustrate our ideas using the two-dimensional Ising model. We discuss several estimates of autocorrelation times in the context of NMCMC, some inspired by analytical results derived for the Metropolized Independent Sampler (MIS). We check their reliability by estimating them on a small system where analytical results can also be obtained. Based on the analytical results for MIS we propose a new loss function and study its impact on the autocorelation times. Although, this function's performance is a bit inferior to the traditional Kullback-Leibler divergence, it offers two training algorithms which in some situations may be beneficial. By studying a small, $4 \times 4$, system we gain access to the dynamics of the training process which we visualize using several observables. Furthermore, we quantitatively investigate the impact of imposing global discrete symmetries of the system in the neural network training process on the autocorrelation times. Eventually, we propose a scheme which incorporates partial heat-bath updates which considerably improves the quality of the training. The impact of the above enhancements is discussed for a $16 \times 16$ spin system. The summary of our findings may serve as a guidance to the implementation of Neural Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations for more complicated models.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.