Paper detail

Analog Lagrange Coded Computing

A distributed computing scenario is considered, where the computational power of a set of worker nodes is used to perform a certain computation task over a dataset that is dispersed among the workers. Lagrange coded computing (LCC), proposed by Yu et al., leverages the well-known Lagrange polynomial to perform polynomial evaluation of the dataset in such a scenario in an efficient parallel fashion while keeping the privacy of data amidst possible collusion of workers. This solution relies on quantizing the data into a finite field, so that Shamir's secret sharing, as one of its main building blocks, can be employed. Such a solution, however, is not properly scalable with the size of dataset, mainly due to computation overflows. To address such a critical issue, we propose a novel extension of LCC to the analog domain, referred to as analog LCC (ALCC). All the operations in the proposed ALCC protocol are done over the infinite fields of R/C but for practical implementations floating-point numbers are used. We characterize the privacy of data in ALCC, against any subset of colluding workers up to a certain size, in terms of the distinguishing security (DS) and the mutual information security (MIS) metrics. Also, the accuracy of outcome is characterized in a practical setting assuming operations are performed using floating-point numbers. Consequently, a fundamental trade-off between the accuracy of the outcome of ALCC and its privacy level is observed and is numerically evaluated. Moreover, we implement the proposed scheme to perform matrix-matrix multiplication over a batch of matrices. It is observed that ALCC is superior compared to the state-of-the-art LCC, implemented using fixed-point numbers, assuming both schemes use an equal number of bits to represent data symbols.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.