Paper detail

An Extension of the Bianchi-Egnell Stability Estimate to Bakry, Gentil, and Ledoux's Generalization of the Sobolev Inequality to Continuous Dimensions

This paper extends a stability estimate of the Sobolev Inequality established by G. Bianchi and H. Egnell in their paper "A note on the Sobolev Inequality." Bianchi and Egnell's Stability Estimate answers the question raised by H. Brezis and E. H. Lieb: "Is there a natural way to bound $\| \nabla φ\|_2^2 - C_N^2 \| φ\|_\frac{2N}{N-2}^2$ from below in terms of the 'distance' of $φ$ from the manifold of optimizers in the Sobolev Inequality?" Establishing stability estimates - also known as quantitative versions of sharp inequalities - of other forms of the Sobolev Inequality, as well as other sharp inequalities, is an active topic. In this paper, we extend Bianchi and Egnell's Stability Estimate to a Sobolev Inequality for "continuous dimensions." Bakry, Gentil, and Ledoux have recently proved a sharp extension of the Sobolev Inequality for functions on $\mathbb{R}_+ \times \mathbb{R}^n$, which can be considered as an extension to "continuous dimensions." V. H. Nguyen determined all cases of equality. The present paper extends the Bianchi-Egnell stability analysis for the Sobolev Inequality to this "continuous dimensional" generalization.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.