Paper detail

An exact unbiased semi-parametric maximum quasi-likelihood framework which is complete in the presence of ties

This paper introduces a novel quasi-likelihood extension of the generalised Kendall \(τ_{a}\) estimator, together with an extension of the Kemeny metric and its associated covariance and correlation forms. The central contribution is to show that the U-statistic structure of the proposed coefficient \(τ_κ\) naturally induces a quasi-maximum likelihood estimation (QMLE) framework, yielding consistent Wald and likelihood ratio test statistics. The development builds on the uncentred correlation inner-product (Hilbert space) formulation of Emond and Mason (2002) and resolves the associated sub-Gaussian likelihood optimisation problem under the \(\ell_{2}\)-norm via an Edgeworth expansion of higher-order moments. The Kemeny covariance coefficient \(τ_κ\) is derived within a novel likelihood framework for pairwise comparison-continuous random variables, enabling direct inference on population-level correlation between ranked or weakly ordered datasets. Unlike existing approaches that focus on marginal or pairwise summaries, the proposed framework supports sample-observed weak orderings and accommodates ties without information loss. Drawing parallels with Thurstone's Case V latent ordering model, we derive a quasi-likelihood-based tie model with analytic standard errors, generalising classical U-statistics. The framework applies to general continuous and discrete random variables and establishes formal equivalence to Bradley-Terry and Thurstone models, yielding a uniquely identified linear representation with both analytic and likelihood-based estimators.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.