Paper detail

An adaptive kriging method for solving nonlinear inverse statistical problems

In various industrial contexts, estimating the distribution of unobserved random vectors Xi from some noisy indirect observations H(Xi) + Ui is required. If the relation between Xi and the quantity H(Xi), measured with the error Ui, is implemented by a CPU-consuming computer model H, a major practical difficulty is to perform the statistical inference with a relatively small number of runs of H. Following Fu et al. (2014), a Bayesian statistical framework is considered to make use of possible prior knowledge on the parameters of the distribution of the Xi, which is assumed Gaussian. Moreover, a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm is carried out to estimate their posterior distribution by replacing H by a kriging metamodel build from a limited number of simulated experiments. Two heuristics, involving two different criteria to be optimized, are proposed to sequentially design these computer experiments in the limits of a given computational budget. The first criterion is a Weighted Integrated Mean Square Error (WIMSE). The second one, called Expected Conditional Divergence (ECD), developed in the spirit of the Stepwise Uncertainty Reduction (SUR) criterion, is based on the discrepancy between two consecutive approximations of the target posterior distribution. Several numerical comparisons conducted over a toy example then a motivating real case-study show that such adaptive designs can significantly outperform the classical choice of a maximin Latin Hypercube Design (LHD) of experiments. Dealing with a major concern in hydraulic engineering, a particular emphasis is placed upon the prior elicitation of the case-study, highlighting the overall feasibility of the methodology. Faster convergences and manageability considerations lead to recommend the use of the ECD criterion in practical applications.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.