Paper detail

Amenability of Schreier graphs and strongly generic algorithms for the conjugacy problem

In various occasions the conjugacy problem in finitely generated amalgamated products and HNN extensions can be decided efficiently for elements which cannot be conjugated into the base groups. This observation asks for a bound on how many such elements there are. Such bounds can be derived using the theory of amenable graphs: In this work we examine Schreier graphs of amalgamated products and HNN extensions. For an amalgamated product $G = H *_A K $ with $[H:A] \geq [K:A] \geq 2$, the Schreier graph with respect to $H$ or $K$ turns out to be non-amenable if and only if $[H:A] \geq 3$. Moreover, for an HNN extension of the form $G = <H,b | bab^{-1}=ϕ(a), a \in A >$, we show that the Schreier graph of $G$ with respect to the subgroup $H$ is non-amenable if and only if $A \neq H \neq ϕ(A)$. As application of these characterizations we show that under certain conditions the conjugacy problem in fundamental groups of finite graphs of groups with free abelian vertex groups can be solved in polynomial time on a strongly generic set. Furthermore, the conjugacy problem in groups with more than one end can be solved with a strongly generic algorithm which has essentially the same time complexity as the word problem. These are rather striking results as the word problem might be easy, but the conjugacy problem might be even undecidable. Finally, our results yield another proof that the set where the conjugacy problem of the Baumslag group is decidable in polynomial time is also strongly generic.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.