Researcher profile

Volker Diekert

Volker Diekert contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Context-Free Groups and Bass-Serre Theory

The word problem of a finitely generated group is the formal language of words over the generators which are equal to the identity in the group. If this language happens to be context-free, then the group is called context-free. Finitely generated virtually free groups are context-free. In a seminal paper Muller and Schupp showed the converse: A context-free group is virtually free. Over the past decades a wide range of other characterizations of context-free groups have been found. The present notes survey most of these characterizations. Our aim is to show how the different characterizations of context-free groups are interconnected. Moreover, we present a self-contained access to the Muller-Schupp theorem without using Stallings' structure theorem or a separate accessibility result. We also give an introduction to some classical results linking groups with formal language theory.

preprint2022arXiv

Reachability Games and Parity Games

Parity games are positionally determined. This is a fundamental and classical result. In 2010, Calude et al. showed a breakthrough result for finite parity games: the winning regions and their positional winning strategies can be computed in quasi-polynomial time. In the present paper we give a self-contained and detailed proofs for both results. The results in this paper are not meant to be original. The positional determinacy result is shown for possibly infinite parity games using the ideas of Zielonka which he published in 1998. In order to show quasi-polynomial time, we follow Lehtinen's register games, which she introduced in 2018. Although the time complexity of Lehtinen's algorithm is not optimal, register games are conceptually simple and interesting in their own right. Various of our proofs are either new or simplifications of the original proofs. The topics in this paper include the definition and the computation of optimal attractors for reachability games, too.

preprint2022arXiv

Solutions to twisted word equations and equations in virtually free groups

It is well known that the problem solving equations in virtually free groups can be reduced to the problem of solving twisted word equations with regular constraints over free monoids with involution. In this paper we prove that the set of all solutions of a twisted word equation is an EDT0L language whose specification can be computed in $\mathsf{PSPACE}$. Within the same complexity bound we can decide whether the solution set is empty, finite, or infinite. In the second part of the paper we apply the results for twisted equations to obtain in $\mathsf{PSPACE}$ an EDT0L description of the solution set of equations with rational constraints for finitely generated virtually free groups in standard normal forms with respect to a natural set of generators. If the rational constraints are given by a homomorphism into a fixed (or "small enough") finite monoid, then our algorithms can be implemented in $\mathsf{NSPACE}(n^2\log n)$, that is, in quasi-quadratic nondeterministic space. Our results generalize the work by Lohrey and Sénizergues (ICALP 2006) and Dahmani and Guirardel (J. of Topology 2010) with respect to both complexity and expressive power. Neither paper gave any concrete complexity bound and the results in these papers are stated for subsets of solutions only, whereas our results concern all solutions.

preprint2011arXiv

Group extensions over infinite words

We construct an extension $E(A,G)$ of a given group $G$ by infinite non-Archimedean words over an discretely ordered abelian group like $Z^n$. This yields an effective and uniform method to study various groups that "behave like $G$". We show that the Word Problem for f.g. subgroups in the extension is decidable if and only if and only if the Cyclic Membership Problem in $G$ is decidable. The present paper embeds the partial monoid of infinite words as defined by Myasnikov, Remeslennikov, and Serbin (Contemp. Math., Amer. Math. Soc., 378:37-77, 2005) into $E(A,G)$. Moreover, we define the extension group $E(A,G)$ for arbitrary groups $G$ and not only for free groups as done in previous work. We show some structural results about the group (existence and type of torsion elements, generation by elements of order 2) and we show that some interesting HNN extensions of $G$ embed naturally in the larger group $E(A,G)$.

preprint2011arXiv

It Is NL-complete to Decide Whether a Hairpin Completion of Regular Languages Is Regular

The hairpin completion is an operation on formal languages which is inspired by the hairpin formation in biochemistry. Hairpin formations occur naturally within DNA-computing. It has been known that the hairpin completion of a regular language is linear context-free, but not regular, in general. However, for some time it is was open whether the regularity of the hairpin completion of a regular language is is decidable. In 2009 this decidability problem has been solved positively by providing a polynomial time algorithm. In this paper we improve the complexity bound by showing that the decision problem is actually NL-complete. This complexity bound holds for both, the one-sided and the two-sided hairpin completions.