Paper detail

Admissibility For Quasiregular Representations of Exponential Solvable Lie Groups

Let $N$ be a simply connected, connected non-commutative nilpotent Lie group with Lie algebra $\mathfrak{n}$ of dimension $n.$ Let $H$ be a subgroup of the automorphism group of $N.$ Assume that $H$ is a commutative, simply connected, connected Lie group with Lie algebra $\mathfrak{h}.$ Furthermore, let us assume that the linear adjoint action of $\mathfrak{h}$ on $\mathfrak{n}$ is diagonalizable with non-purely imaginary eigenvalues. Let $τ=\mathrm{Ind}%_{H}^{N\rtimes H} 1$. We obtain an explicit direct integral decomposition for $τ$, including a description of the spectrum as a sub-manifold of $(\mathfrak{n}+\mathfrak{h})^{\ast}$, a formula for the multiplicity function of the unitary irreducible representations occurring in the direct integral, and a precise intertwining operator. Finally, we completely settle the admissibility question of $τ$. In fact, we show that if $G=N\rtimes H$ is unimodular, then $τ$ is never admissible, and if $G$ is nonunimodular, $τ$ is admissible if and only if the intersection of $H$ and the center of $G$ is equal to the identity of the group.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.